October 30, 2008 – 12:38 pm
Remember that saying, a picture is worth a thousand words? Is that still true in the age of Photoshop? Once, in the not too distant past, people could trust what they see with their own eyes. Or, at least they thought they could.
My dad emailed me a video today. If it is real, it is one of the most amazing things I’ve ever seen. My initial reaction to the video was, “that’s not real.” I’m sure most people had the same reaction.
Is the video real? I don’t know. Quite possibly, but that doesn’t mean I believe it. Was it Photoshopped?
Photo manipulation is as old as photography itself. Joseph Stalin would frequently alter photographs to remove unwanted faces, mostly for political and propaganda purposes. This is something completely different than the video above. The video above is intended to impress, while these photographs were intended to PROVE.
In 2005, when Martha Stewart was released from prison, photographs of her were altered to make her appear slimmer, as though she lost weight while behind bars. Time magazine changed the color saturation of OJ Simpson’s mug shot to make his skin appear darker. National Geographic moved the Pyramids closer together so they could get all three to fit on the cover of their magazine.
While the plane video was intended to impress, the Stalin photographs to prove, these last three examples were presented as FACT. People had no reason to question them, and the effects were mostly subliminal.
All examples of photo manipulation are harmful in one way or another. The photographs presented as fact are dangerous because people don’t question them. A doctored mug shot of OJ with darker skin only heightens racial stereotypes. Same goes for the Stalin photographs, where he was able to remove people who disagreed with him to present a unified front.
The plane video, if false, is dangerous for a different reason. Okay, let’s assume the video is real. Videos LIKE the one above that ARE doctored are dangerous specifically because people are so used to them that they don’t believe video evidence.
All three examples are dangerous because some people can’t tell which is the real and which is the fake. Some Stalin supporters believed the original photographs were fakes. Another example is a couple of Frenchmen who took the 911 videos of the planes crashing into the Trade Center and removed the planes, leaving only the explosions. Conspiracy Theorists then saw these videos, believed them, and then went on to believe that the videos that DO show the planes were the ones that were doctored.
Now, I don’t know if this post fits the new direction I talked about yesterday, but it is something that has been on my mind for a while.
Belief.
What do we believe in, what do we base that belief on, and how do we know that belief is grounded in reality when reality is so easily manipulated? Substitute reality with truth and the question works just as well.
Take the political elections as an example. Emails have been floating around claiming Obama is a Muslim. Some people actually believe a chain email over physical evidence. They’ll even believe that chain letter over their own Presidential nominee. Or take this video. One that is NOT real. One that is not only ridiculous, but absolutely disgusting. Yet, as we all know, some people will believe it is real.
Has perceptive reality become actual reality? The surreal become real? Fiction become truth ? Vice become Versa?
Chris
Posted in politics | No Comments »